Post by [LEON] Joust on Feb 15, 2009 1:21:40 GMT -8
Well, even the admin has skipped out on you all. I don't give a damn about what reason the staff come up with to hide the fact that the admin left when these new rules were brought in place. Don't really care about much really as Amtrum would probably attest to.
But bringing in these new rules, based off a discussion with members months old, with the only REAL discussion done between the staff in an unviewable board, really makes me say this.
All the staff, get on your bikes.
I know I'm not very liked. But eh, that's not the point. My point is that any decision to be made I will make the opposing point of view. Simply because not every decision can be made with everyone just saying, yes, to everything we can.
And now that Leon is gone, I got very little point in remaining civil so I'll now go on in something that will make me look like an idiot. But will hopefully get a few things questioned.
Why was it that this was brought in without the consultation of it's members?
Why was it brought in WITHOUT warning?
And why does Gallagher annoy me when I look at him?
It was stated that if everything was brought before the members attention, then nothing would get done. But I thought this site wasn't to become like 552 where the staff made executive decisions without querying it's members.
Always question the administration, but remember to always silence the questioners.
Figure it out what I mean by that. I wont bother telling you and I can guess right now 99% of you will understand it wrong.
But bringing in these new rules, based off a discussion with members months old, with the only REAL discussion done between the staff in an unviewable board, really makes me say this.
All the staff, get on your bikes.
I know I'm not very liked. But eh, that's not the point. My point is that any decision to be made I will make the opposing point of view. Simply because not every decision can be made with everyone just saying, yes, to everything we can.
And now that Leon is gone, I got very little point in remaining civil so I'll now go on in something that will make me look like an idiot. But will hopefully get a few things questioned.
Why was it that this was brought in without the consultation of it's members?
Why was it brought in WITHOUT warning?
And why does Gallagher annoy me when I look at him?
It was stated that if everything was brought before the members attention, then nothing would get done. But I thought this site wasn't to become like 552 where the staff made executive decisions without querying it's members.
Always question the administration, but remember to always silence the questioners.
Figure it out what I mean by that. I wont bother telling you and I can guess right now 99% of you will understand it wrong.